This puts an end to my two months of intense search for Montreal’s finest steaks at steakhouses, butchers and steak shops. The results of such search is always controversial: this or that one was perhaps forgotten, this or that one has the advantage of offering this or that whereas the other does not, bla bla bla. But the advantage I have is that I am not paid to do this, therefore do owe nothing to anyone, it is my own hard earned money and all I care about is sharing what I think is fine or not. You take or you leave it.

So, I paid a visit to Boucherie Bio Saint-Vincent (Marché Jean Talon), known as one of Montreal finest butchers. What sets them apart is that the meat they sell comes from the Charolais cattle (as opposed to the wide offering of Canadian and US Black Angus), a breed that I know well thanks to my long years  in France. Their  Charolais is raised here locally in Quebec at les Fermes Saint-Vincent , grass fed, and the meat is aged for at least 21 days.

This is quality meat, there is no doubt about this, and at the simple visual inspection of the rib steak, I was impressed by the superb texture of the meat  as well as great condition of the  the bone that’s attached to it (recently, I was served at an upscale steakhouse with a rib steak which bone was bent in such an unappealing way that I had visions of the beast being mistreated…imagine how tiny were the chances for that steak to score high..those seem to be little details but a superb steak scores high on all fronts, even on such seemingly futile aspect).

The thing to set straight is that there is no debate over this being superior or not to the other steaks I have scored high  earlier on. Charolais is known to  feature a meat that’s essentially lean, so take this into account if you want to order this meat. This is grass fed, whereas all the steaks I reviewed earlier on were mostly corn finished.  On the aspect of tenderness, I have no reproach to raise:  it was perfectly tender, though expectedly a bit firmer than some of the Certified Canadian Black Angus  rib steaks  I have  sample (normal, the Black Angus rib steaks had obviously higher marbling and were aged longer).   On the aspect of the aging, Charolais beef being lean, you can’t really expect the deep aging effect of a  long dry aged rib steak of the fattier (obviously not a bad thing when it comes to meat flavor) Canadian Black Angus breed, to take an example.  That said,  for my taste, and with the reminder that Charolais and Canadian Black Angus are great in their very own merits,  Maitre Boucher Marc Bourg’s 40 days aged rib steak remains the most impressive cut of all the aged rib steaks I tried all along this rundown, especially for its texturally well accomplished marbling and an aging aspect that shone through superbly (fabulous gamey/nutty character).

So Voilà, my rundown of Montreal finest steaks and steakhouses is over. It is just meat, so as I wrote earlier on, your good luck lies in the hand of your butcher, his ability to select the finest meats out there. Serious butchers like Marchand du  Bourg and Boucherie Bio Saint-Vincent (Marché Jean Talon) do not cheat with quality, so boot from there.

On an ending note, here are my suggestions for what I view as a top of the crop rib steak:

1.Pick a 2′ thick rib steak. It is just more appealing to watch, and if there’s anything
faulting, it is easier to spot.
2.Bone-in, not boneless. Again, better for the visual aspect, it adds flavor and nature never lies:
a bone in superb condition tells a bit about how well the animal might have been treated.
3.I personally prefer a beautiful dry aged bone-in rib steak than the fresh vivid red textured
younger ones. The trick here is to get a butcher who is ahead of his colleagues on virtually all fronts:
-it needs to be a serious butcher with the exceptional ability to shop for the finest meat possible.
A good way to know if your butcher rises to the challenge is to question him/her about his way of
selecting his/her meat. Just ensure you have informed yourself a lot about meats, have experienced a lot
with their subtleties, visited farms, are passionate about the subject, and trust your instinct:
good liars will always leave trails of BS on their way. Real serious butchers stick to strong principles
of quality.
-rib steaks from some breeds and at higher grading do  react better to proper aging technique.
for example, I find that a carefully selected quality Canadian  Certified Black Angus is better rewarded — compared
to some other breeds — to a high standard dry aging technique. His marbling simply reacts well, its texture
showing a convincing beautiful and natural smoky-looking aging appearance. Lower grades do certainly suffer
from less convincing beautiful aging aspect, and non serious condition of aging (wrong temperatures, inappropriate aging room)
always lead to amateurish cuts
-a great butcher knows how to get the most of his aged rib steak. For example, I never trusted mixed aging techniques
such as wet aging then dry aging, etc. They just don’t provide beautiful aging texture, in my experience. Long dry aging
a nicely marbled and carefully selected meat provides simply better aged cuts. A butcher who seems to genuinely
understand this principle is a winner in my personal assessment.
-Look at how the aged rib steak meat is stored. It should be hanged, unless you are, of course, picking it from
a counter at a meat shop. But then again, I prefer the butcher who goes in his aging room and slice that cut
in from of me.
-if you see your aged meat sealed in plastic, look elsewhere. Aged meats need to breath
-a butcher who encourages you to spice your aged rib steak with pepper and sauces is basically suggesting
a recipe to kill the appreciation of the meat. After all, this is perhaps the sign that his rib steak is not enoughly
good to be appreciated in its full glory.
-butchers are like musicians. The better ones will fire more inspired vocal compositions. Notes if you want.
so if your butcher keeps repeating what all other keep saying, it is not one of the best. A sign of a great butcher
transpires in the little inspired gestures that makes a real difference in the enjoyment of your meat.
As an example, during this 2 months run down, Maitre Boucher Marc Bourg was the only one  to suggest I lay the piece of meat in a specific position  while its resting on the counter before being grilled. That is showing great understanding of  meat, since indeed that position ensures proper continuation of the butcher’s hanging technique and improves tenderness. Great call.
-If your butcher seems to play little attention to details about the treatment of the cattle, the level of stress at slaughtering, the diet of the cattle…that is not a good butcher at all
4.Beautifully dry aging of a carefully selected high grade rib steak reacts well on a grill. No need of oiling the grill or your meat for real top quality dry aged cuts. You’ll kill its fabulous texture. Just lay that beautiful cut of rib steak  on the bbq grill  for the time that matches with the doneness you want to achieve. Do not go beyond medium rare! Do not add butter! No Pepper, Lol! Let it rest in aluminium foil and just pour a bit of fleur de sel on that beauty! Enjoy!

PS:  If you know of any place where I can sample Simmental, please let me know.

LEFTAll reviews of my Michelin star meals will be listed  on the left, from the higher to lower rated meals. But this blog, despite its name,  won’t focus anymore solely on my  restaurant reviews. It will, from now on, be the full expression of my own self with posts — in both my mother tongue (French) as well as in English – covering everything from my vision of the world, arts, cooking, literature, travel, etc. A  blog in its conventional definition, which means the expression of whatever I have on my mind and that I deem interesting to share.

Whenever I visit a new restaurant in Montreal, you will find that review linked in the summary of all my Montreal restaurant meals.

…To be completed soon. I love this Basilica for its surprising visually splendid interior. Not to worry: I am not a preacher, Lol  Just a huge fan of old world architectures and since most churches are architecturally stunning, my camera is fond of them. To come, soon…

After my incomplete (life is always a work in progress and shall always remain so ;p) article on Montreal finest steakhouses, I continued my search for the finest cuts in Montreal.  This time I paid a visit to the latest   star of   Montreal’s steak scene, Maitre boucher Marc Bourg‘s steak shop.

Mr Bourg  has big plans for his aged steaks. He told me that he wants the entire globe to get a bite of them. I am always happy  to see a Quebecois with huge ambitions like those.  It is a nation with tremendous potential in many many regards (I think it’s the land of the best voices around the globe, I think Luce Dufault is the best singer of all times, I think that Quebec’s hydro-electricity will be one of tomorrow’s best exploited treasures, I think Quebec is one of world most artistic nations, I think this land has a charm you’ll never see anywhere else. The only thing that I do not agree with it’s when some papers want to sell this land as a world dining destination. NO…IT IS NOT! ). Who knows, he might perhaps be the next big International Quebecois star after the likes of Celine Dion, Cirque du Soleil, SNC Lavallin, Bombardier, etc. Something is certain, Mr Boug is already not your average “marchand de steak”  : a grand table l like L’Europea is already interested by his steaks and the sky seems to be the limit in the case of Mr Bourg.

Maitre boucher  Marc Bourg (aka ‘Mr Steak’) has opened his own Steak shop, after more than a decade  in the meat industry. In his current assignment, he is to meat what a Maitre affineur is to cheese,  shopping for what he considers to be the finest pieces of meat, then dry-aging them to  40 days and more (as an example, he has cuts of 120 days and more ). I picked a 2’ cut of Mr Bourg’s 120 days as well as one of 40 days cote de boeuf (rib steak) and fired two  steaks  that were as great as / if not superior to    the  steaks of the finest upscale steakhouses in town, only it was in the comfort of my backyard, no tips and pricey wine to absorb as it is the case at a steakhouse.  Both steaks  did indeed benefit from great care, proper dry aging technique and their expected nutty and gamey character (typical of a great dry-aged cuts) shone through beautifully.  Though,  I have to admit that I did not pay full justice  to this great steak: I used a gas grill instead of a charcoal one. Mr Bourg telling me that it will be intesresting to do a side to side comparison between a charcoal grill Vs gas filled one. But you know, a great deal of food appreciation is hidden in that little brain, so I told him…I think the charcoal grill is better ;p

When I saw my bottle of Poderi Aldo Conterno Barolo 2007, left aside for a grand moment like this,   kicked down (accidentally) by my dog (no worries, I still luv u puppy! ;p) , I remembered one saying of my mum: “humbly you were born, humbly you will live, so always be detached of material matters”.  Oh well Mum, it worked, Rfaol:  I still had a huge smile on my face and the tamarind juice did the trick ( I am kidding about the tamarind juice.  Obviously, Tamarind juice is not what you want to pair with a steak).

Aged steak is a fascinating  subject. As with anything  in life, you have its detractors and its fans, each calling their opponents will all kind of names. Who’s right, who’s wrong (oh NO..wait.. well, I am right, Rfaol!…) , no one will ever know and, anyways, it just does not matter since your palate will be the ultimate judge. An interesting article over aged meat: http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2010/07/is-aged-beef-overrated/60577/. I can submit to  you as many arguments in favor of one side as I could for the other. What I can tell you, though is this: (1)Anyone telling you that someone enjoying aged steak is someone who knows nothing about beef and just want to impress ..is a bullshiter in Chief! A 40 or 120 days beef does certainly not taste the same as a 21 days aged cut, but it is erroneous to think that it does not taste of beef anymore and therefore it is left to hunters of sensations  /or the type of wealthier people who have lost touch with the  value of things / or simply to people who cannot understand the value of things. I doubt that those criticisms come from people who really can appreciate the difference of an aged cut of meat and have no doubt that their cynicism  is 100% Pure BS propaganda! (2)we all read stuff like the more the beef is aged,  chances are that it will not taste of beef. Again, did they really try the aged beef that they are talking about??  Did they have the patience to wait that long? I doubt. In my experience, if I take, for example, the 120 days aged cut of Mr Bourg, there’s no doubt that it tasted of beef. There’s no doubt that I was eating beef and not cheese or blue cheese as some tend to force their imagination into. Only, since it is aged, the beef flavor is more concentrated.

The thing to understand right away is that it (aged steak)  is a  pricey affair as expected from any item in which extra care and skills have been invested. Mr Bourg making no secret of that: he even told me, this (my 2’ steak, weighing almost 1 kg) is perhaps too much for 1 person (indeed, you need a big appetite for a 1kg of steak, but I was sharing it with my wife and some friends), recommending that I do not splurge too much and that I do  really ensure that is what I want (he is right: if for example you are a great fan of 10-15 days aged fresh cuts of meat, you really need to know what you are after when interested by older cuts   / but I have always enjoyed both fresher and older cuts for years),  that no loss of meat, etc).

I think this Gentleman is exceptional at what he is doing. How many takes that extra path of informing, customizing the experience of buying a steak? In a world where cash flow is the only thing that matters? Sure, you can tell me that it is a marketing technique and that I am dumb. Good, bravo, hourrah! .  So, why are there few of those merchants offering such down to earth advices???

As for me using parsimony,  oh well.. There’s a reason I’ll never be rich, Lol. I have the highest respect  for  those cultivating a frugal mentality, but in my  mind, tomorrow is always…. my last day. It is the way I see things. So I told Mr Bourg:  Sir, I want both your 120 days steak (again, think twice…this is quite $$$. I don’t disclose prices of luxurious items — not that it is personal, but by principle: in a world of global econonomic turmoil, I am of those who believe that it’s insane to show off numbers. You can think whatever you want about this, but I’ll stand by this principle) , but you need to think twice and you’ll have plenty of time to think about that because 1.Mr Bourg is not the kind who will force you into his most luxurious items and 2.you really really really need to love steaks and ensure you can appreciate aged steaks), and the 40 days cut.

I did follow the advices of Mr Bourg, advices that are proper to the grill (a cheapie standard one that I don’t even know the model but which capability I am very well aware of ;p) I was using , doneness I wanted (medium rare) and thickness of my rib eye cut (don’t forget, it is a 2’ steak) : warmed my grill for while to max out heat, grilled 3 mins on one side, 3 mins on the other, 3 mins resting on indirect heat of my bbq grill (turned off the bbq) and let it rest for 5-10 mins (in aluminium foil  in my case, to keep the heat). The recommendations were spot on, but be very careful: it is IMPORTANT you adjust those steps  to your own realities: know the real power of your bbq grill, get familiar with the proper timing used by your grill to achieve specific doneness,  etc.  I personally find that the beauty with aged steaks of such top quality (remember how the breed, level of stress of the animal at slaughtering, etc…are just a fraction of the of what makes a steak great, therefore the faith of your steak depends on the ability  of your butcher to be very selective) is how easy it will help you in achieving  that trendy nice dark caramel-ly crust most look for these days. Superb pieces of steak  like this one DOES NOT  need   butter, oil,  or pepper.  They  deserve great sides, though. I did pair my steak with spinach and some crimini mushrooms  (sautee them with a bit of beef fat / or bone marrow + the  juice from the cooking of the meat after it has rested ,  salt and pepper, a bit of butter. Season that steak ,at the time of serving, with a bit of fleur de sel. Life is sometimes crual ;p

I liked: (1)- the superior steak (as great as best  steaks of Montreal finest upscale steakhouses, the 40 days steak  I fired was even superior to those standards, whereas the 120 days was packed with great concentration of game /nutty  flavor ), (2)-  the very down to earth and ‘customer is the king’ friendly mentality of Maitre boucher Marc Bourg. Where most rush to sell and move on swiftly to the next customer, he took his time to customize the experience and share on the subject of savouring a superior steak with me, with detailed infos on the breed, origin of the meat, his techniques of aging, and plenty of very useful tricks. An exceptional artisan at what he does, caring and competent, leaving  no stone unturned (even his retro looking shop that is a bit reminiscent of a saloon of  the far-west calls for a break in this speedy world ).
I did not like:  Oh yeah, well, I was seriously pissed…while I was grilling my steak, there was a bird flying over my flowers, Lol. Just kidding, there was absolutely no quibble to raise with this steak I was having. As I wrote earlier, for such quality steak, imagine how charcoal would have paid it full justice.
Breed: Alberta Black Angus (for the 120 days), Quebec Black Angus (for the 40 days)
Origin: Alberta (for the 120 days), Quebec (for the 40 days)
Grade: AAA for the Quebec’s one, AA for the Alberta one
Dry or wet aged? Dry in both cases, the meat properly hanged as it should (as opposed to being sealed in plastic)
Aged for: 40 days for the Quebec one, 120 days for the one from Alberta
Worth the hype? Absolutely, if you can appreciate aged steaks . I found the passion and enthusiasm of Maitre boucher Marc Bourg to really reflect in the quality of his steak.  It’s a steak of grand occasion, easily competing with the finest steaks of Montreal’s upscale steakhouses. So ensure you can really enjoy the difference.  A friend of mine once told me that he spent his  a honeymoon in Santorini, Greece, one of world’s most picture-perfect sceneries….only to get this smart observation from his gal: ‘Oh well…it’s just an endless coverage of blue water’. Rfaol. So, that is it:  if for you caviar is nothing, there’s not much we can exchange about, Lol. Everything is indeed pure BS in such case. On the other hand, if you enjoy the beautigul things of life, then go for  it.

Web site:  http://www.marchanddubourg.com/

Montreal is not a city for steaks.  The scores you’ll see below are scores limited to Montreal steakhouse  standards. If I had to start comparing those with the finest in the US,  just as an example, the scores would be even lower.  Let alone, the finest Argentinian, French, Japanese, Australian, Spanish  cuts of  meats that are virtually not present in Montreal while remaining high on the list of this globe’s  most praised meats. Montreal  has couple of steakhouses that are widely known as the finest of the city. The most notorious of them all is La Queue de Cheval of  charismatic restaurateur Peter Morenzos.  Other highly regarded Montreal steakhouses are  Rib n Reef, Moishes, 40 Westt, Gibbys.  Choices of meat do not vary that much: mostly  US Black Angus,  occasionally some cattles from Alberta and recently some Australian Wagyu.  Of course, Montreal have other steakhouses but those are the most expensive as well as known as being the finest.

You’ll find below the reviews of following steakhouses:
-Queue de Cheval
-1221
-Moishes
- Rib’n Reef

La Queue de cheval  (aka the Q    http://www.queuedecheval.com)  is an iconic steakhouse in Montreal. There has been a split, recently, which resulted in the Q moving from its original location (they were on 1221  Rene Levesque Street ) to a temporary spot (1234 De la Montagne, but they are planning to relocate soon) and the other half of the team remaining where they used to be (now re-named Steakhouse 1221). If you are curious to know where  Montreal’s legendary restaurateur Peter Morentzos did end up, the answer is that he is the strongman of the Q.     The Q is pricey, therefore I can’t afford heading there on a regular basis. This being only my 2nd visit in 5 years. But not many steakhouses in town offer the quality of  beef and  the proper depth of knowledge/expertise you can  find at places like this,  therefore I find it justified to splurge once in a  long (only when I feel like really enticed at the idea of dining out at a top steakhouse ) while on Montreal top steak contenders (Moishes, Gibbys,Rib n Reef, Queue de Cheval). In a long long  while.

At their current temporary location, there’s a tiny bar made of marble as well as a relatively small dining room that they share with nightclub 1234 (another reason I chose to eat there earlier in the evening). I sat at the bar, which ensured a completely different ambience from my last visit here (last time I was at the Q, I was in their grand dining room on  René Levesque), with my waiter, Thomas, offering stellar service where professionalism and warmth is perfectly balanced. Thomas is a charismatic gentleman of the type you occasionally  encounter at few grand dining destinations.

Picked their classic 20 oz bone-in Lou cut’s rib steak (I chose the corn-fed Colorado’s Black Angus USDA Prime cut as opposed to the mostly grass-fed Kansas cuts / At touch, smell,  and look,  I can  and always  judge the dry-age of a meat myself,  and my cut had less than 30 days), the precision in cooking absolutely faultless with that steak I was having: medium rare as requested, medium rare is delivered.  The good  marbling delivering enjoyable steak flavor, the usda prime quality being indeed a cut above most of  the non usda prime versions found at most steakhouses in town. Objectively a good steak by upscale steakhouse standards in Montreal.

The problem with the Q, based on my visits here, is not a problem of quality nor cooking skills (the problem, as with most upscale steakhouses in Montreal, is $$$). As an example, their take on the tiramisu (it’s their take on it, so do not expect comparisons to traditional Italian versions of the Tiramisu) was delicious, technically well crafted. The Brazilian coffee done properly, the salad fresh but over-overpriced for what it was. The problem, as it’s oftently  the case with upscale places  like the Q is the price.   I do not disclose details about the amount of  my bill, since I value such infos as purely personal, but their prices can be found on their web site.
It is admittedly always hard to tell whether a steakhouse of this standard worths all that money. No one will ever have the absolute answer, anyways.  But it’s not rocket science to fire a great steak in a back yard, so buying a great aged steak at my butcher remains the best cost effective option.   What I insist on doing, though,  is to avoid mixing up the effect that prices have on our judgement with the real appreciation of what I am eating. With price in mind, I have always valued 95% of the dine out scene to be widely over-rated. So if I decide to dine out, I am looking for other factors to fill the gap: in this case, the expertise/knowledge  about their meats, the way they age them, etc. Things that move me out of what I’d be able to do at home: I can cook a steak at home. But I do not age steaks. So I opt for the cuts they’ve invest the extra mileage I could not.

Factsheet – The steak I had on this meal at the Q:
20 oz bone-in Lou cut’s rib steak
Breed: Black Angus
Dry or wet aged? Dry
Grade: USDA Prime
Upon visual inspection, indeed this  had USDA Prime marbling distribution. Of course, USDA Prime is not only about marbling, but this was the element I could realistically factor as a diner looking at  his steak
From: Colorado, US
Aged: less than 30 days (for the cut I was having)
Corn? Grass? Matters less than factors such as the breed and skills/care of the farmer, but this was corn-finished and as such, it only makes sense that cattles feed mostly on grass.
Do they have a mostly grass-fed cut? YES, their Kansas cut.
Buttery flavor (Poor>Decent>Fair>Good>Great>Exceptional): Good 7/10
Juiciness      (Poor>Decent>Fair>Good>Great>Exceptional): Good 7/10
tenderness     (Poor>Decent>Fair>Good>Great>Exceptional): Good 7/10
Timing         Proper timing/ the steak was not rushed to the table upon cooking
Cooking        (missed, achieved)                       : Achieved (requested medium rare, served medium rare)
Personal appreciation (Disapointed>Satisfied>Blown away): Satisfied
MY Overall score for this steak                                      :  7/10
Deserves its rank as one of the finest few steakhouses in Montreal:
Absolutely, the seriousness/care, dry-aging, sourcing makes this one of the finest steakhouses in Montreal.
Just don’t draw comparisons to the finest of NYC, for example.
Service: Thomas is simply one of world’s best in the hospitality business.
In my Top 10 steakhouses ever? No, but remember it’s a always a subjective matter, that the grass tends to always be greener at the neighbor’s, that I just had rib steak on my past 2 visits here,  whereas they have other cuts, from other breeds, etc
What I liked: (1)The world class service of Thomas (2)The opportunity to discuss steak with a knowledgeable staff (3)Because it was early and there were not many people, the ambience felt intimate (3)Although limited in variety, the wine by the glass was relatively decently priced by upscale steakhouse standards in Montreal.
What I did not like: (1)Pricey as one should expect from an upscale steakhouse that walks the extra mileage that such steakhouse have to invest in  (2)The wines by the bottle are $$. (3)Wines by the glass are limited to very few choices
Final Notes: I did not elaborate on the decor because it’s a temporary location that they are currently sharing with the Nightclub BAR 1224. It’s actually funny since when I was younger I wished all bars were attached to a nightclub to get my refill of protein right on the spot ;p

1221 Steakhouse (http://www.1221steakhouse.com/ ) is the other half of what used to be la Queue de Cheval. So after visiting their other half, La Queue de Cheval on De la Montagne, I paid a visit to them. I was particularly curious to see the difference between their rib steak, especially since both teams have benefited from the same knowledge, for so long and the split is just recent.
At 1221, I picked their 20 oz Rib Steak dry-aged 28 days steak.  There’s something that we all need to know: when you go to such upscale steakhouse, in Montreal, the dry-age period does not reflect  on the price as it logically can be the case at some places abroad, or perhaps elsewhere in Canada:  logically,  the older cuts are the priciest. Not in Montreal steakhouses. On the flip side, you can end up with a 40 days the same way you can get a 20 days dry-aged steak (28 days minimum at 1221), for the same price. I was lucky at 1221, on this visit:  my cut was dry-aged for easily around 40 days, and it therefore was a  more flavored than, say, the one I had the day before at the Q. Both the Q and 1221, during this visit, served their rib steak with garlic. So, I’d recommend you order a side dish to go along. In this instance, I ordered their onions rings (7/10 good onion rings, large in size, prepared properly but I think I have to get used to the fact that less salt/spice  is better for health. It was a healthy serving of onion rings. But still, for  someone like me who enjoys big bold strong flavors, the climax was nowhere to be found). The steak itself:  can’t complain since it was cooked precisely, and the resting carefully timed. A 7.5/10 for me (both the Q and 1221 not altering the steak flavor with superfluous flavor-enhancement, which is what you should  expect   from a top steakhouse indeed, but their mix of steak spicing –they lay a bit of  that on their steaks —  is one that is not a secret recipe…so if you are looking for the next mysterious/revolutionary steak seasoning, you might have to knock at other doors ).

Factsheet – The steak I had on this meal at the 1221:
20 oz bone-in rib steak (They don’t call it LOU’s CUT)
Breed: Black Angus
Dry or wet aged? Dry
Grade: USDA Prime
Upon visual inspection, indeed this  had proper USDA Prime marbling distribution.
Of course, USDA Prime is not only about marbling, but this was the element I could realistically factor as a diner looking at  his steak
From: Colorado, US
Aged: Easily more than 40 days (for the cut I was having)
Corn? Grass? Matters less than factors such as the breed and skills/care of the farmer,but this was corn-finished and as such, it only makes sense that cattles feed mostly on grass.
Buttery flavor (Poor>Decent>Fair>Good>Great>Exceptional): Good to Great
Juiciness      (Poor>Decent>Fair>Good>Great>Exceptional): Fair
tenderness     (Poor>Decent>Fair>Good>Great>Exceptional): Good to great
Timing         Proper timing/ the steak was not rushed to the table upon cooking
Cooking        (missed, achieved)                       : Achieved (requested medium rare, served medium rare)
Personal appreciation (Disapointed>Satisfied>Blown away): Satisfied
MY Overall score for this steak                                      :  7.5/10
Deserves its rank as one of the finest few steakhouses in Montreal:
Absolutely, the seriousness/care, dry-aging, sourcing makes this one of the finest steakhouses in Montreal.
Just don’t draw comparisons to the finest of NYC, for example.
Service: Gianni was extremely patient, and I appreciate his very accomodating behaviour ->
fearing that my bill would reach skyrocked highs, especially with the price of wine, I did put a brusque halt to any extra splurge, so no dessert, no coffee, nothing else .  Instead of treating me in a snooty way (especially with the close table of wealthy gentlemen feasting on caviar, lobster and champagne), he was as caring to me  as he was to his wealthier patrons. Hard to not like a service like this.
In my Top 10 steakhouses ever? No, but remember it’s a always a subjective matter, that the grass tends to always be greener at the neighbor’s, that I just had rib steak on my past 2 visits here,  whereas they have other cuts, from other breeds, etc
What I liked: (1)The classic steakhouse decor with the aged steaks displayed at the entrance, the warmth of black stones mixed with rustic wood. This place is big and special in its own way (2)I was lucky to stumble upon that 40 ++ days aged cut.  It made quite a difference: as expected, a tad more concentrated in beef flavor than the cut I had the day before at the Q, the flavor benefitting for the expected extra concentration of meat flavor. It was on its way to develop the nuttier aromas of some exceptional dry-aged cuts, therefore really a cut packed with character in the aspect of texture in particular. The kind of cut that calls for a pause, then admiration of the work behind it, then you can start devouring, Rfaol!
I did not like: (1)Pricey as one should expect from an upscale steakhouse that walks the extra mileage that such steakhouse have to invest in  (2)Wines by the glass are way way WAY too pricey…..for example, the steak-friendly and good red wine Louis M Martini Cabernet Sauvignon 2009 can’t be priced in the 20ish by the glass….when it cost almost the same $$$  for the bottle at the SAQ. FOLKS…WE ARE NOT IN A MICHELIN STAR VENTURE, HERE …………
Final Notes: Did you notice that I scored this steak with a 6/10 on the aspect of tenderness? Which is paradoxal in theory , given that the longer the cut was aged, the more tender it’s supposed to be. Make no mistake: this cut was tender, but
I had cuts that were even more tender and that were not aged this long, so tender that I could cut them with a spoon. This is not a bad thing btw, since again, this cut was tender enough for a steak of this standard, but I am glad I have experienced this  paradox as a reminder that theory and practice are sometimes just two different buds. That there’s never just one possibility that counts, but a myriad, depending on a vast umbrella of factors reinforcing the suggestion that a cut of beef will never be as simple as stating that bone-in ribs are more flavorful than boneless ones (there’s a steakhouse in Montreal that has stopped being a favourite of mine since they change their boneless ribs to bone-in ones…), this breed is better than that one (I have enjoyed stunning cuts of incredible beef flavor from supposedly poor breeds as I have experienced with poor meat from supposedly great breeds), corn is better than grass (in my lifetime top 10 best steaks, I have as many corn-finished as there are mostly grass fed-ones), etc

Moishes (http://www.moishes.ca/) is considered as Montreal #1 steakhouse on many web forums as well as restaurant review web sites. Forbes Magazine even rating Moishes in World’s top 10 steakhouses in 2008, and   this wikipaedia article telling everything you need to know about the glory of this widely praised steakhouse destination .  It is an institution with already 75 years behind it. The interior decor is very elegant in its  classicism,  and to me, this is the warmest and prettiest steakhouse dining room of the city (I find it even prettier than Gibby’s — Reviews on Gibby’s and Rib n Reef will come soon). The service was flawless on this evening, the young lady at the reception being very welcoming and most of the staff   hospitable. Another big hit:  you have a variety of breads, some pickles, butter (with ice on them) as well as   as some coleslaw served for free, which makes this steakhouse one that’s exceptionally generous with its side offerings (apart bread, you do not get that much extras alongside your steak at most steakhouses in town). My problem was with the main feature of the evening :  my 3 weeks boneless rib steak (colorado  USDA Prime according to my waiter) could not compete with the superior aged bone-in rib steaks I had at the Q (around 30 days) or 1221 (40 days ++)  in the aspects of tenderness (at same doness, which they achieved perfectly  – I required Medium rare– this steak I was having at Moishes remained a bit too firm  for a rib eye steak to be fully enjoyable) and depth of  meat flavor (the bold rich beefy flavor I came to expect with this  cut was certainly not at the forefront, on this instance) .  There are plenty of reasons to love Moishes, such as the charming service and the lovely place, but if you meet someone claiming that this is the #1 Steakhouse in Montreal, send him back to his homework:  he needs to visit all of this city’s finest steakhouses first!  The Gentleman who was serving me was a very patient and offered superb service, but he had no answers to some of my  questions   (grass fed? corn finished, etc),  so I’ll have to go with a shortened factsheet of this rib steak, which I scored (overall score) with a 5/10:

Buttery flavor (Poor>Decent>Fair>Good>Great>Exceptional):  Poor
Juiciness      (Poor>Decent>Fair>Good>Great>Exceptional):  Decent
tenderness     (Poor>Decent>Fair>Good>Great>Exceptional):  Poor
Timing         Proper timing/ the steak was not rushed to the table upon cooking
Cooking        (missed, achieved)                       : Achieved (requested medium rare, served medium rare)
Personal appreciation (Disapointed>Satisfied>Blown away): Disapointed
MY Overall score for this steak                                      :  5/10
Deserves its rank as one of the finest few steakhouses in Montreal:  In my opinion, No. A rib steak is the easiest cut to work with. Bold beefy flavors is its raison d’etre. You say rib eye, you automatically think rich meaty flavor.  It has to dazzle.

I liked:        The warm classy and cozy decor, down to earth and charming welcoming
I did not like:  My steak!  For me, this   3 weeks boneless rib steak (no bone-in rib eye at a time when bone-in rib steaks are all the rage?? Something is sure, the waiter told me there was no bone-in rib steak when I asked ) was not even close to the character of the finest  bone-in wet age steaks of 30 to 40 days I enjoyed either at Montreal’s steakhouses or bought from local butchers.  Which took me by surprised given the praises over this steakhouse. What I also found disconnected from the praises seen everywhere on the web   (btw, I too do love Moishes  but I can’t pretend that this is the finest steak or among the finest  I had in this city. It’s simply NOT the case, as far as I am concerned) is the opinion about the side of baked potato.  It’s Ok, not stunning and eventhough there is a lot of babbling about  chain steakhouses being poor, I have to say that at the end of the day  I can only deal in facts and that the baked potato of a chain like the Keg has pleased me far more than this one I was having at Moishes.  I also enjoy being presented with my steak before it goes to the grill, a piece of theater that adds to the experience of a grand steakhouse dinner and that I did appreciate a lot at places like the Queue de Cheval and 1221.  That did not happen on this visit. Same for the wine by the glass  (the glass arrived with no presentation of the bottle).  I am not one who will force his imagination to let prices affect  my appreciation of things,  so never rely on me for such things like value (although I know very well what  might perhaps be  cost effective or not), but prices aside (For the record, this steak at Moishes cost me almost the same price at the Q or 1221), my steaks at the Q and 1221, during this round up, were easily 2 cuts above my steak on this meal at Moishes.

Rib’n Reef  (http://ribnreef.com/  ) – In Montreal, you basically have two leagues of steakhouses : one that’s known as the upscale steakhouses in the city (Rib’n Reef, Queue de Cheval, 1221, Moishes, Gibby’s, 40Westt) and the other one comprising of  the likes of the Keg, Maddison Grill, Houston, etc. Again, which one is better will come down to what you are looking for.   I have no judgement other than recommending that you try them all and see what matches your expectations. A personal matter. As for me, I took my hard earned money and went to find for myself since I want to know where I can bring my wife or what to recommend to close friends and relatives. In the process, I am just sharing what I think with you. This time, I visited R’n’R. R’n”R interior is relatively vast, with several sections: for eg, classic dark wood dining areas, cigar lounge, rooftop terrace, etc In order to compare apples to apples, I pursued with the same cut (rib eye steak)  I chose at other reviewed upscale steakhouses (Queue de Cheval, 1221, Moishes are already reviewed in current post), at exact same doneness: medium rare. Prices for a rib eye steak of mas o menos similar size (for eg, 20 oz at Queue de Cheval and 1221 / 18 oz at R’n’R) is almost the same  at all the upscale steakhouses of Montreal (approx 55$).
Factsheet – The steak I had on this meal at Rib ‘n Reef:
18 oz Bone-in Rib steak
Breed:  Black Angus
Dry or wet aged? According to the waitstaff, it is awet aged for couple of weeks then dry aged for an extra month
Grade: USDA Prime
From: Colorado, USA according to my waiter
Aged: 1 month minimum (for the cut I was having)
Corn?  Corn fed
Buttery flavor (Poor>Decent>Fair>Good>Great>Exceptional):   Decent
Juiciness      (Poor>Decent>Fair>Good>Great>Exceptional):  Fair
tenderness     (Poor>Decent>Fair>Good>Great>Exceptional):  Fair
Timing         Proper timing/ the steak was not rushed to the table upon cooking
Cooking        (missed, achieved)                       :  Achieved (requested medium rare, served medium rare)
Personal appreciation (Disapointed>Satisfied>Blown away):  Not Disapointed, not fully satisfied. Just Ok
MY Overall score for this steak                                     5.5 /10
Deserves its rank as one of the finest few steakhouses in Montreal:  For me, Not for now. But this place shows a lot of pride and will to improve that I trust its rib steak  could one day reach the standards of those of La  Queue de Cheval or  1221.
Service:  Daniel fabulous service is of the highest hospitality standard
What I liked: (1) Daniel’s incredible service (2)At Moishes, I was impressed to see that they served pickles, bread, coleslaw. Sounds like nothing miracular, but you won’t see that oftenly in Montreal. But Rib n Reef went even further. They served those same items (coleslaw being superior at Moishes, in my opinion and the pickle as plump and of remarkable quality, except that Moishes served more of them), and completed the meal with even some cookies. Not the beginning of a new life cycle, rfaol, but a rare touch at a Montreal steakhouse.
What I did not like:  I love my steak thick, exactly as what they served at 1221 and the Q.  For me, a good 2′ thick inch rib eye steak opens my appetite, it locks more juiciness/tenderness. Theirs was about 1′ inch thick (or slightly more, but slightly).  I also like when you show me the steak prior to grilling it, which they’ve omitted on this instance.  Last but not least, this rib steak was certainly nicely aged, but not to the point of reaching the close to gamey/nutty character of the steaks I had at the Q or 1221. The wait staff explained that it  was  wet age then dry aged . If that is the case, then perhaps just dry aging it all the way would be more successful.
Final Notes:  A classy steakhouse, which  has not impressed me with its rib steak on this visit, but that remains promising (I’m always amazed to see people who are always curious about getting better).

Whenever I’ll drop by (more accurately, re-visits..usually once every 3, 4 years since, honestly,  we   could reproduce most of the hype at home..think of a steak picked at a reliable local butcher……) the other upscale steakhouses in Montreal, I will add my views to this post.  This rundown is now almost completed (I just have the review of 40 Westt and Gibby’s to write whenever I have a moment, but no steak at those upscale steakhouses went above the score of 7.5/10 all along this 2 months of visits. The finest steak I sampled during this rundown came actually from the steak shop of Maitre Boucher Marc Bourg: for my taste and based on what I do /and came to expect from the finest  rib eye steaks in North America, his 40 days 2′ thick dry aged Certified Black Angus will, from now on, be the one against which I will judge all  other rib eye steaks this side of the world. It simply had the edgeon all fronts: fabulous texture, deep beef character, superb aging technique, exemplary quality of the meat. Which I found actually logic given the exceptional attention to details that Mr Bourg is known for. If I was served his steak at a steakhouse in Montreal, I would have rate it with a 9/10, which would have been the highest score I ever assigned to a rib eye steak at a steakhouse in Montreal. 
My thoughts about Montreal’s upscale Steakhouses:

-When you are a rich , I’d guess price never matters. But I am not, therefore for my money,  proper sourced and aged cuts at a reliable local butcher wins.

-Which steakhouse is the best in Montreal goes down to trying the finest ones (Moishes, Gibbys,Rib n Reef, Queue de Cheval, 1221) and see which one matches the best with  your expectations.   In my experience,  Montreal finest steakhouses is a cut, a times two cuts,  below their competition in say, the US, Spain, etc.

-Grass fed, corn fed: a non debate, folks….I was hesistant to actually mention this  in my  reviews of Mtl steakhouses, because enjoying steaks is not as simple as saying I love grass fed steers over corn-fed ones. It’s actually erroneous to embark on that propaganda wagon.  Cattles need grass, pasture being their natural diet. Then, depending on the popular demand at  some geo locations, corn plays a role in their diet,  usually not long before the animal is slaughtered  so that more fat is imparted to the meat. But meats is not tasty because of grass or corn.  As a matter of fact,  I have enjoyed as many mostly-grass fed cuts (for example Charolais,  Limousin)  as corn-finished ones (widely praised in North America, so you take your pick…. ).  Food is like anything in life: surprises have more chances to come from the neighbor, Lol. Rarely from home ;p In 2012, a cut of solely grass-fed Galician beef outside of  San Sebastian (Spain)  rose as one of the finest cuts I ever put in my mouth. Could that be the effect of the “grass that’s always better at the neighbor’s??”..??..perhaps. I personally don’t care about the reason, I just want to know what beef tastes best to my palate…but think about it. …..meat is much more than just grass fed / corn fed.  The breed of the cattle, the care and knowledge of your farmer might be the recipe of your  next best piece of steak ;p

COST-EFFECTIVE OPTION: BUYING YOUR OWN DRY-AGED STEAKS AT A RELIABLE BUTCHER
You’ll need to look at your local butchers. Aged beef is not common since it is obviously  not a lucrative idea
(when you age your meat, you obviously end up with less of it to sell), but some butchers will dry-age the beef.
Again, which ones are the finest come down to your own taste, expectations, experience with steaks.
Recently, I have tried the Steak shop  Le Marchand du Bourg   as well as  Boucherie Saint Vincent at Jean Talon market.

LEFTAll reviews of my Michelin star meals will be listed  on the left, from the higher to lower rated meals. But this blog, despite its name,  won’t focus anymore solely on my  restaurant reviews. It will, from now on, be the full expression of my own self with posts — in both my mother tongue (French) as well as in English – covering everything from my vision of the world, arts, cooking, literature, travel, etc. A  blog in its conventional definition, which means the expression of whatever I have on my mind and that I deem interesting to share.

Whenever I visit a new restaurant in Montreal, you will find that review linked in the summary of all my Montreal restaurant meals.

CHEF David Toutain is back. Well, soon. Chef Toutain is not only one of world’s most gifted Chefs but what a Chef: forget the easily manipulated puppet-cooks fueled by the promotion of their ego on TV, forget those who went washing dishes at some big restaurants and came back in their cities with the fake  clothes of a wanna be grand Chef…forget those. Think of a Chef, a real one with exceptional REAL talent, real charisma, real deserving praises. A real artist behind  his stoves: Chef David Toutain. Last year, while his talent was all the rage throughout the globe, for his work at Agapé Sustance, Chef Toutain did what the average cooks have hard time doing: instead of cashing in and taking advantage of the momentum (with the usual easy route of big appearances on TV, multiple restaurants), he resigned, and took a year long break to pursue his discoveries of the world.  For now, follow this great interview that Franck Pinay-Rabaroust did with Chef Toutain.

LEFTAll reviews of my Michelin star meals will be listed  on the left, from the higher to lower rated meals. But this blog, despite its name,  won’t focus anymore solely on my  restaurant reviews. It will, from now on, be the full expression of my own self with posts — in both my mother tongue (French) as well as in English – covering everything from my vision of the world, arts, cooking, literature, travel, etc. A  blog in its conventional definition, which means the expression of whatever I have on my mind and that I deem interesting to share.

Whenever I visit a new restaurant in Montreal, you will find that review linked in the summary of all my Montreal restaurant meals.

Some needs low life’s jokes a make a point about being  fun. But for me, the coolest are those who manage to stay away from the easy-ness  and still manage to be genuinely fun and Karl Lagerfeld is one of the few who manages to do just that: pulling off real fun humor, in sub·tle·ty  and class. What sets him apart? He plays with your mind, Rfaol! By far one of world’s most interesting characters.

Have fun:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703983704576277292669720956.html

http://www.wmagazine.com/w/blogs/editorsblog/2011/04/25/karl-lagerfeld-interview-magnum.htm

http://hypebeast.com/2011/4/w-magazine-thirty-minutes-with-karl-lagerfeld-interview?_locale=en

http://www.txtpost.com/interview-karl-lagerfeld/

http://www.lexpress.fr/styles/mode-beaute/mode/karl-lagerfeld-je-suis-une-meringue-ambulante_578498.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/karl-lagerfeld-interview

http://www.interviewmagazine.com/fashion/karl-lagerfeld/#_

LEFTAll reviews of my Michelin star meals will be listed  on the left, from the higher to lower rated meals. But this blog, despite its name,  won’t focus anymore solely on my  restaurant reviews. It will, from now on, be the full expression of my own self with posts — in both my mother tongue (French) as well as in English – covering everything from my vision of the world, arts, cooking, literature, travel, etc. A  blog in its conventional definition, which means the expression of whatever I have on my mind and that I deem interesting to share.

Whenever I visit a new restaurant in Montreal, you will find that review linked in the summary of all my Montreal restaurant meals.

…..Ma lettre à L’UNESCO

UKWhat follows below is my letter to the Director of  UNESCO in regard to a suggestion I believe to be logical:  implementing an International court of Justice for crimes against world heritage.  With alarming destruction of very important sites such as the Timbuktu’s ancient mausoleums, the ancient city of Alep, etc, it is a matter of time before it becomes just another normal custom to tear down everything that the past has left for us.  There are courts that  exist for war criminals, but the sake of  world heritage, humanity’s memory, is abandonned to speeches and theories.  Without memory, our lives have no meaning. Next generations will have no historical legacy.  Therefore this  also deserves its International Court of Justice. I doubt this letter below will be taken into consideration, but to me it is just a symbolic “kick off” for my fight against the crimes that our World   Heritage is   victim. Join me in the petition that I have started in order to put pressure on the relevant International Organizations –United Nations, UNESCO (email me at  saveworldheritage@yahoo.ca ) so that they, in their turn, start thinking about moving beyond speeches.

french_flagDixit un brillantissime pseudo moraliste  de cisconstance à qui j’expliquais l’importance de se mobiliser contre le véritable carnage que subit en silence plusieurs vestiges de notre patrimoine mondial:  ‘Bof…ca t’énnerves parceque ca n’interesse que toi’. Brillant! Si Bozo le clown pouvait s’efforcer de voir un petit peu plus loin que le bout de son nez, voici ce qu’il appercevrait:  l’héritage de l’histoire, c’est un peu comme la mémoire de l’humanité.  Ce que Monsieur semble ne pas comprendre c’est que des générations entières seraient livrées à une totale ignorance de leur histoire  si on contemplait placidement la disparition de nos acquis historiques.  Une  vie sans mémoire est une vie sans aucun sens.

Il est interessant de noter la présence de tribunaux pour crimes contre l’humanité. Parcontre, la destruction de sites de haute importance du patrimoine mondial (mausolées de Tombouctou,  Alep en ce moment), autre poumon de notre …humanité…celle là est objet de sanctions  beaucoup plus clémentes .  Ceux qui  assassinent la mémoire de l’humanité doivent etre sanctionnés de crimes contre …le patrimoine de l’humanité.  Tel est donc la teneur de ma lettre à L’UNESCO (détails de la lettre ci bas).  Cette lettre  est succincte et n’a qu’une faible valeur symbolique,  mais  je ne m’arreterai pas là:  joignez  vous à moi pour compléter une pétition afin de faire pression sur les hautes instances internationales   (Cour Internationale de Justice de la Haye, Les Nations Unies, L’UNESCO) afin que ceux qui détruisent notre patrimoine mondial soient condamnés  pour crimes contre l’humanité (écrivez moi à    saveworldheritage@yahoo.ca).

A Madame Irina Bokova
Directrice  de L’UNESCO
7, place de Fontenoy 75352 Paris 07 SP France

Madame la Directrice,

Je voudrai par la présente vous faire part d’une suggestion qui me parait appropriée
en regard aux  crimes contre le patrimoine mondial, patrimoine défendu par votre organisation L’UNESCO,
qui ne cessent de se multiplier à un rythme inquiétant, de Tombouctou à Alep.

La suggestion étant de promouvoir l’idée d’un tribunal International contre les crimes contre
notre patrimoine mondial, à l’image de ce qui est déjà en place pour d’autres crimes contre l’humanité.

En souhaitant que cette suggestion mène à un processus que je souhaiterai plus  concrète
dans le but constructif de préserver les précieux acquis historiques si chers à la survie de la mémoire de
notre humanité.

Soucieux de militer pour cette cause, je porterai ladite suggestion à l’attention d’autres instances tel
que le sécrétariat général de L’ONU et surtout le Tribunal International de Justice à la Haye.

Je vous prie d’accepter, Madame la Directrice, mes respectueuses salutations et compte sur votre pragmatisme pour éviter qu’une telle cause n’appartienne au folklore des idées sans aboutissement.

—————